The REAL motive for their attempts to “believe”: racist rat-fuckery

Creationists still cling to obsolete stereotypes concerning the “three distinct families of man” descended from Noah’s three sons (Custance, p. 204) and even talk candidly of the Afro-Asian “Hamites” being “possessed of a racial character concerned mainly with mundane matters” and subject to displacement by “the intellectual and philosophical acumen of the Japhethites and the religious zeal of the Semites” (Henry Morris, 1977, p. 130).

https://ncse.com/cej/4/1/impossible-voyage-noahs-ark

Or, as Lee Atwater put it in a (somewhat different) context:

You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger.” By 1968 you can’t say “nigger” — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I’m not saying that. But I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nigger, nigger.”

There are some things which which are literally unbelievably stupid:

Either you understand them (in which case, they are unbelievable

Or, you “believe” something you admit to be incomprehensible

Credo quia absurdum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credo_quia_absurdum

Now, I’ll admit it: The vast majority of those who claim to ‘believe” stuff like Noah’s ark, had it perpetrated on them during childhood, and are – in most cases — too thoroughly trapped in “Crimestop” to EVER allow themselves to be ‘tempted” to actually think about the topic, rationally:

As Orwell put it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime

The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous thought presented itself. The process should be automatic, instinctive. Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak.

He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop. He presented himself with propositions—’the Party says the earth is flat’, ‘the party says that ice is heavier than water’—and trained himself in not seeing or not understanding the arguments that contradicted them.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s