Time For another dip into the pseudo-intellectual chamber-pot that is Karl’s “mind”:

Probably the single best window into the workings of Karl’s “mind” would be his “hideously experimental homepage”.


This isn’t so much a “homepage” as an entire site of pages dedicated to….well, you’ll see for yourselves. 🙂

Karl brags about the fact that he “hand-coded” the various pages using a text editor (as opposed to a WYSIWYG editor.)

This would be more impressive, if he had also put even a modicum of thought into ensuring that the site itself wasn’t blindingly ugly.

THIS is the background image, in isolation:

A rundown of the contents:

  1. A color-spiral (most likely screen-capped from some “Euro-Demo” or other)
  2. Some partially-disassembled computers
  3. An Amiga
  4. A TRS-80 Coco 2
  5. some random bread-boarded mess
  6. A kitten

Keep in mind: he didn’t simply post the separate images themselves.  Instead, he as COMBINED THEM INTO A SINGLE, COMPOSITE IMAGE, which is then “tiled”, for use as the background image on the FIRST page confronting visitors to his ugly-ass page.

Now,, (assuming that visitors haven’t simply fled from this hideous, seizure-inducing monstrosity out of hand, we get to what Karl considers to constitute worthwhile “content” for a web-site.

First, we get THIS:

Karl claims to love Max Headroom.

Now, you might be wondering why he is such a fan.  Is it because anything about the show itself makes for worthwhile viewing?

Predictably, no.

Karl’s “reasoning” is as follows:

Max rulez! Partly because, like Techno’s web pages, he was created on an
Amiga computer.”


Notwithstanding the publicity for the character, the real image of Max was not computer-generated. Computing technology in the mid-1980s was not sufficiently advanced for a full-motion, voice-synchronized human head to be practical for a television series. Max’s image was actually that of actor Matt Frewer in latex and foam prosthetic makeup with a fiberglass suit created by Peter Litten and John Humphreys of Coast to Coast Productions in the UK. This was then superimposed over a moving geometric background. Even the background was not created using computer graphics at first; it was a piece of hand-drawn cel animation produced by Rod Lord, who created similar “computer-generated” images for the TV series Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Later, in the United States version, the backgrounds were generated by a Commodore Amiga computer.


In other words (according to Karl’s “reasoning”), the only thing about Max Headroom which actually ‘rulez” is the fact that they generated the background imagery behind a guy in a latex mask, using an Amiga computer – during that latter part of the U.S. run of the show.

Moreover, even when they used an Amiga, it was merely to duplicate the existing cel-animations.

(Sorry, but this strikes me as equivalent to claiming that 1980s TV news “rulez” because they happened to use a “video-toaster” to do the text overlays).

Some other “highlights” of this ugly train-wreck of a “homepage”:

The Psion Series 3c is Techno’s favorite portable computer
(at least until the development of an Amiga laptop)

Techno compares Personal Digital Assistants and Palmtops

One 8-bit microcomputer stands out above the rest:
the TRS-80 Color Computer

The TRS-80 Model 100 is an impressive retro portable computer

Check out Techno’s Microcomputer Museum and Calculator Collection

Techno comments on the PC and the Mac

Techno rants and raves on various topics…

Another product of Techno’s twisted mind: Binary Poetry


Now, notice a few things:

  1. Any sane person would place the Psion series 3c stuff as a sub-page in his comparison of “personal digital assistants and palmtops”.
  2. Why the hell is the Color Computer stuff NOT a sub-page of his “computer museum”?
  3. He has a calculator collection.

I’m not going to waste time wading through his inane yip-yap about computers, except to point out that he couldn’t even get the “max Headroom” thing right.  Make of this what you will.

My only major other complaint about this is his use of the term “PeeCee” in reference to what any sane person would probably term either “Wintel” or “x86-architecture”, or suchlike.

(True, I use the term “Micro$oft” occasionally, but that is a genuinely clever “wordplay”, based on the fact that the corporation in question is rapaciously greedy and “gouging”).

The term “PeeCee” is just….what, exactly?

Does he believe that DELIBERATELY ADDING extraneous letters is somehow “pejorative”, in some way?

Are we supposed to think of “seeing” someone “pee?”


At any rate:

After his (poorly-sorted) internal link-farm, the illustrious gentleman goes on to opine thusly:

This page looks best viewed on an Amiga, but supports all browsers (including Lynx, like any worthwhile page). Techno’s pages are not enhanced for Netscrape, and the only sort of Explorer which meets with Techno’s approval comes from Ford.

This page is perpetually under construction…

Last updated: 14 February 2001 (but Techno’s other pages may have been updated more recently)

Brought to you by the mind of Techno and the resources of Digital Indigo Technologies

Ah….where to even begin? (sigh….)

  1. The fact that his “perpetually under-construction” site hasn’t been updated in nearly twenty years?
  2. The fact that the aforementioned Ford Explorer ended up undrivable, langishing in his parents’ back yard — with animals living in it?
  3. Yes Karl, we totally “get” the fact that the Amiga gives you total “Geek-wood”.  You *also* “collect” calculators.

I think the most blatantly idiotic part of the whole site is the Binary Poetry:



Well, it rhymes, doesn’t it? 🙂

Converting the above from binary to decimal, we get:





Answer: No, you pretentious, pseudo-intellectual little shit-nugget, is DOESN”t “rhyme”.

There: I’ve saved you the trouble of having to wade through Karl’s inane, brain-destroying “homepage”.

You’re welcome. 🙂



Karl: in his own words

(Note: this doesn’t qualify as “doxing”, because the information is already publicly-available.  If the stupid dickhead wants to complain about it, he can attempt to remove his qrz profile.)

This is a direct dump from Karl’s QRZ profile.  It will give you a deeper insight into exactly what sort of “person” he is:

Hello, my name is Karl, from ‘Pennsylvania Dutch Country’ (which is actually Pennsylvania German, but that’s another story). I have gear for every US ham band from 160 meters through 900 MHz, as well as receive capability below, between, and above these bands. I enjoy DXing and ragchewing on HF SSB, and local VHF/UHF FM operating. I have a special fondness for HF AM (as well as VHF), though I don’t really have a worthy station set up yet. I also like Field Day, but otherwise am not really a contester. I am not a paper chaser; I don’t bother with awards or QSL cards (nor have I gotten into the various implementations of virtual QSL cards). I like CW, and have recently been getting back into the mode after not using it much for a long time. I did quite a bit of packet, RTTY, and AMTOR operating back in the day, but haven’t done much digital since the onset of ‘sound card’ modes (I always liked real data controllers, like a TNC or Kantronics UTU). I have the equipment for such operation (like many other things), just haven’t devoted much time to it. I’ve always really liked shortwave listening, VHF/UHF scanner listening, and some AM/FM/TV DXing here and there. I’ve also played around with weather fax, SSTV, ATV, DRM reception, LF beacon reception, decoding digital voice, and various other bands/modes.
I have recently become quite interested in SOTA (Summits on the Air), a very cool activity involving portable operation from mountaintops. So far I have only activated a few summits, though I have worked over 120 summits as a chaser, and I am hooked! SOTA is also providing the incentive which I have needed to get back into CW.
If you work me on HF or 6 meters, I am probably using my Yaesu FT-450 or FT-817 with HL-45B amplifier into the 80 meter horizontal full-wave loop at the LRTS club site (club call W3AD; more details below under resurgence of interest). For anyone who cares, this site is just over the line in Lancaster County, a fraction of a mile from Lebanon County, in grid square FN10tf.
Mobile station: Yaesu FT-857D with SGC SG-237 autotuner and 6 foot/1.8 meter whip + Icom IC-2720H with Austin dual-band whip in Jeep Wrangler
Portable gear: Yaesu VX-7, VX-3, FT-817, Alinco DJ-G29T (the VX-7 and FT-817 are easily my two favorite radios EVER!)
I also have numerous other transceivers and receivers; these are the ones I use most often. For whatever reason, I have definitely become a Yaesu fan. Icom and Kenwood (as well as other companies) just don’t have anything interesting to offer at this point.
Outside of radio (is there such a thing?), I worked my way up from being an electronics technician to an embedded hardware and software engineer, having designed industrial control systems for various markets. More recently, all of the ‘opportunities’ I’ve found have turned out to be dead ends. While I look for work, I’ve been developing some amateur radio accessories which I hope to turn into a product line. Of course, investment is at least as hard to find as a decent job…
Other hobbies include geocaching, hiking, off-road driving, listening to EDM (especially trance, house, and techno), rifle and pistol shooting, collecting old computers and calculators, high-end LED flashlights, and using superior/alternative computer hardware and operating systems (ARM processors and Linux for example, such as on the remarkably cool Raspberry Pi). Of course, most of these tie together: I always have an HT along when I’m out in the woods, geocaching has some striking similarities to SOTA, the Jeep has an HF/VHF/UHF setup in it, and my interests in computers and radio both go back as far as I can remember.
Very early on, I recall writing a BASIC program on a TI-99/4A which displayed random data on the screen, and I pretended it was a satellite data downlink. Not many years later, I digipeated packets through the Mir space station and back to myself (for whatever reason, ISS has never intrigued me the way Mir did). I also wrote a BASIC program which turned a Radio Shack Color Computer into a repeater controller, and later a simplex repeater controller. That was while I was still in college, before I even started repairing equipment professionally, let alone designing it. I can’t say that amateur radio caused my interest in and pursuit of the electronics field (though it has certainly been a huge part of it); I’ve always just been into all of the above for as long as I can remember. Keep in mind that the entire field of electronics initially developed as a result of the pursuit of radio.
My amateur radio non-interests would include such things as D-Star, Echolink, and the like. Proprietary codecs, hideous audio quality, lack of interoperability, and dependence upon inferior hardware and operating systems as well as the internet are not hallmarks of real amateur radio. If you want digital audio, get a cell phone (which, at least on a proper GSM network, sounds better than any digital two-way format; CDMA, on the other hand, could give D-Star, DMR, etc. serious competition in the garbled, underwater sound category). If you want to talk to someone on the internet, use a VoIP phone. One significant advantage of amateur radio is its robust simplicity, all of which is thrown out the window when it becomes dependent upon overcomplication and outside networks.
Another annoyance is the proliferation of continuously active repeater link systems which tie up numerous repeater pairs with redundant, overlapping coverage of the same content-free conversations. Bizarrely, some such systems automatically shut down at night; I suppose emergencies only occur during business hours or something. Makes one wonder if such systems have anything to do with fulfilling the mandate of amateur radio or providing any useful service, rather than merely feeding someone’s ego…
SDR definitely has major potential as a way forward, as long as it is implemented properly. Making it dependent upon inferior mass-market hardware and operating systems (Intel processors and Windows for example) is the opposite of a way forward. Besides the stability and reliability issues, I much prefer a radio to look and feel like a radio, not a black box connected to a lowly PC. Computers are useful accessories for radio communications, but I would rather not have a hard drive crash or virus (or myriad other failures) compromise basic radio functionality. Not to mention, waiting for a radio to boot up is simply absurd.
I have mixed feelings about eSSB. Good audio is always a nice change, but it seems somewhat pointless to run massive amounts of audio processing gear on SSB, which doesn’t have a carrier to quiet the noise between speech components the way AM does. Additionally, the excessive bass components which are often present make correctly tuning an SSB signal much more difficult, and can detract from readability depending on conditions. Good quality AM, on the other hand, is one of the most pleasant things I’ve ever experienced on radio.
I was interested in amateur radio for years before I finally got my ham license at age 14. I always knew I was going to become a ham, I just didn’t know when. A local club advertised a Novice class, finally giving me the opportunity to get involved. I upgraded to what was later known as Technician Plus immediately thereafter. I had a lot of fun on 10 meter SSB with a modified Realistic TRC-458 base station CB rig, and 2 meter FM with crystal-controlled radios and then a Ten-Tec 2591 synthesized 2M HT (one of the worst transceivers I have ever used!). Unlike some people, I will also admit that I was pretty heavily involved in 11 meter CB operation around that time, and had a lot of fun with that as well. That band, despite its obvious shortcomings, is still somewhat nostalgic to me.
About 5 years later, while in college, a member of the club in that town offered study sessions for the General class upgrade. I attended those, and did lots of CW practice on 10 meters with another local ham, getting to where I could copy 15 WPM pretty solidly. I went to a VE test at a hamfest, and jumped from Tech Plus to Advanced. I passed the Extra theory as well, but never got my CW speed up to 20 WPM. It took about another 15 years until I finally got around to the Extra upgrade. My call is still my original Novice call sign.
I’ve gone through various phases and levels of activity, though I have always made a point of having an HT with me and mobile VHF/UHF radios in my vehicles even when I wasn’t particularly active. More recently, I have also had an HF mobile setup, though I haven’t done much operating other than local VHF/UHF activity. We’ve also had a decent setup at our radio club site on a local mountain (W3AD, the Lancaster Radio Transmitting Society, http://www.lrts.org/), but I hadn’t done much operating overall from there for years either.
That all began to change during the winter of 2012/2013. N3TUQ and I started to discuss what we could potentially do to improve the HF station at said club site. We had been using a 75 meter dipole fed with ladder line, along with an LDG autotuner and balun. It worked reasonably well on most HF bands, but it had trouble tuning up on some bands, it received a lot of noise, and it created RFI problems. We wondered what more might be possible.
We came up with the idea of a rectangular horizontal loop, approximately a full wavelength long on 75 meters. We figured out that we could install it in a slightly different location than that of the dipole. We hoped that this would cut down on noise and RFI issues, as it would be farther from the power lines, towers, guy wires, main operating building, and the equipment shelter containing repeaters and other equipment.
Some research turned up CNC machined Delrin insulators called Ladder Snaps, which would allow us to construct open-wire feedline from 14 AWG wire, which should outperform the ladder line. We also decided to use proper antenna wire and rope from DX Engineering. The plan was hatched, parts were ordered, and then we waited for decent weather. Even before it arrived, some of the undesired trees and brush which had overgrown the area where we wanted to place the loop began to be cleared.
The following spring, we assembled a group and got to work. Before long, we had the envisioned loop constructed and installed at roughly 20-25 feet/7 meters. One intriguing characteristic was made possible by a special Delrin insulator from the same supplier as the Ladder Snaps: the entire antenna and feedline are constructed from a single, contiguous piece of wire. There are no joints or splices anywhere. The new open-wire line is suspended by ropes, keeping it away from all metal and other objects from the feedpoint all the way to the operating building. Inside, it connects to the balun, and from there about one foot of Teflon coax leads to the tuner, minimizing loss in that critical (and often overlooked) area. We also put extensive effort into cleaning up other potential noise sources at the site. Most of the computer networking hardware has been moved into the shelter with the repeaters. Most switching power supplies have been eliminated, with much of the site running from several banks of 12 volt batteries (which also back up the repeaters), with a single large switching supply (with an added EMI filter) inside the shelter to charge them.
The results of this effort have been nothing less than spectacular. I have operated HF from this site on many weekends since installing the loop, and not even trying terribly hard, I have already worked all 50 US states and over 150 DXCC entities. All of these contacts were made with no more than 100 watts (many from my FT-450), while some were made with just 5 watts from my FT-817, and others with an HL-45B amp boosting it to 50 watts. It has become common to break through pileups, and I have received many reports like ‘big signal’. The elevation of this site (roughly 1170 feet/356 meters above sea level) certainly helps, but the antenna still outperforms anything else we have ever tried up here. It tunes up more easily and consistently on virtually every band from 160 through 6 meters than the old dipole ever did. It also does not appear to have any significant directional characteristics, as I have worked DX all over the globe. At one point, I was told that I had the strongest signal on the entire 20 meter band by a European station with an SDR display. Perhaps even more amazing is the fact that I have worked Europe on 75 meter SSB with no trouble in August and September. I never dreamed that such was possible without transmitting 1500 watts into phased arrays or Yagis and receiving on Beverages. More recently, winter conditions actually let me work Europe on 75 meter SSB with 5 watts from an FT-817!
The loop is amazingly quiet on receive. 20 meters in the summer (barring something like a thunderstorm or power line noise) often has an S0 background noise level. I’ve simply never experienced anything like this; that’s likely why I have done more HF operating in the last several years than I probably did total in the previous 25 years. That activity level is also what prompted me to update this page, as people are actually looking me up here now. 😉
I made an interesting discovery as a result of trying to minimize the receive noise at this site. We used to take it for granted that there was simply a lot of noise everywhere, as there were so many switching power supplies strewn about and so on. We figured that’s just how it was, and we had to live with it. Now, the bands were actually quiet for the most part. However, there were still certain frequencies where significant noise spikes were present. One in particular got my attention, and became the focal point of my investigation: a strong, rough carrier near 14.273 MHz. Tuning around, I noticed similar signals on other frequencies. I found a pattern: they occurred at regular intervals of approximately 61.06 kHz. I started calculating and tuning in other multiples, and soon realized that the same signals recurred across much of the HF spectrum.
Listening on a handheld receiver and shutting down every possible source of RFI in the entire site did not eliminate the signals. We determined that some of them were actually coming from a neighboring site used by another amateur club. After much research and experimentation, I finally found the source of the signals: 100BASE-TX, otherwise known as 100 megabit wired Ethernet networking. Not any particular device, but the standard itself. I found a spectrum graph of a 100BASE-TX transmitter, and it shows broadband noise from the bottom of HF through at least 150 MHz, with the strongest peak around 15 MHz. No wonder I first found it on 20 meters! I now also know the mechanism by which it radiates: the use of unshielded Ethernet cable of any grade lower than good Category 6. Cat 5 or 5e cable is not sufficiently well balanced to contain these signals, and by its very nature performs a differential to common mode conversion.
I have since confirmed this in numerous installations, both commercial and residential, with a very simple (in retrospect) technique. Take a handheld radio with HF receive coverage and a VHF/UHF rubber duck antenna, and tune it to 14.275 MHz AM (I typically use a Yaesu VX-3 and a Maldol Active Hunter antenna; any similar setup should provide similar results). It may be necessary to open the squelch on the radio. Hold the antenna next to an Ethernet cable with an active 100 Mbps connection on it, and there is virtually guaranteed to be a strong signal present. Move the antenna along (and perpendicular to) the cable slowly, and the signal will increase and decrease in strength several times per inch of cable. This is literally a result of each individual twist in the twisted pair converting some of the differential signal into common mode radiation. The worst offenders can be heard for some distance away from the cable, even with such an intentionally insensitive receive setup. Note that shielded Cat 5 or 5e (if properly terminated), as well as quality unshielded Cat 6, do not generate nearly as much interference. This also totally explains the various reports I’ve heard over the years of ‘wireless routers interfering with 2 meter HTs’ and such. It has nothing to do with the wireless aspect; a wired 10/100 switch does exactly the same thing. It should also be noted that I tried extensive experiments with ferrite cores and grounding; no combination of the above (not even 8 cores on a single 6 foot patch cable) made any significant difference in the radiation from the cable. Think of the cable as being similar to the leaky coax which is often used to radiate signals along its length intentionally inside tunnels and similar settings.
I conclude from my research and experience that unshielded Cat 5 or Cat 5e should absolutely never be used for anything higher than 10 Mbps Ethernet, especially in an environment where any type of HF or VHF receiver will be used. Note that gigabit Ethernet generates a similar overall spectral profile, though with different modulation characteristics; it appears to generate more of a broadband hash than discrete carriers, but still causes interference.
I recently discovered that even some unshielded Cat 6 cable is capable of radiating considerable RFI. As already dictated by common sense anyway, shielded cable is simply the only way to go to assure a clean installation.
Further research has revealed the origin of the 61 kHz spacing between the RFI carriers. 100BASE-TX uses a 125 MHz clock, which is divided by 2047 in a scrambling circuit. This is intended, ironically enough, to reduce EMI by spreading the signal across a wide portion of the spectrum, rather than generating very strong peaks at frequencies such as 31.25 MHz (125 MHz / 4) which would otherwise be generated by the MLT-3 coding scheme used. 125 MHz / 2047 = ~61.064973 kHz, which totally explains the spacing of the offending signals.
Additionally, I have found similar carriers offset by 1/2 of the expected 61.06 kHz spacing in certain portions of the spectrum. This appears to be particularly pronounced in the upper HF and VHF region.
I have written eHam reviews of various radios and accessories. Here are direct links to some of my favorites:
I’ve also written reviews for various microphones, older HTs (Yaesu VX-5 and Standard C558A), the SGC SG-237 tuner, and others. Stay tuned for more as time permits.
This is a work in progress, and will be updated as I have the opportunity. I plan to add pictures, and possibly move some of the content to my own web page; I just wanted to put the info out there in some form as a starting point. Hopefully someone finds some of this to be interesting and/or beneficial.
I love the stream-of-consciousness rant about networking cable.  It has nothing to do with his personal “ham shack” (IE: the busted-ass jeep) – and everything about the desperate desire to dazzle random passerby with his (nonexistent) “intellect”.
He used to do exactly this sort of bullshit “back in the day”, at the local ham radio club meetings — nitter-nattering on about his then-current obsession (6JB6 tubes), at the least appropriate times.
For example:
Q “Hey Karl how’s your mom?”
A: “Oh, she’s the same as always – not interested in the fact that I’m trying to design, using these 6jb6 tubes I got out of that old TV my parents had in the garage.”
This sort of thing is also the primary reason trying to learn anything from Karl is such an infuriating experience: there’s something extremely unsettling about mind-numbing pedantry from somebody with the attention-span of a ferret on meth.

“moral panics” are subhuman:


Some woman and her husband were basically ‘railroaded” back during the “Satanic ritual abuse” bullshit back in the 1980s.  She was (finally) released some years ago — having been imprisoned for nonexistent “crimes” — because self-proclaimed “vigilant parents” were gullible as fuck, engaged  in a “witch-hunt”, and ended up victimizing these people, as a result.

I offer this up as a “cautionary tale” to anyone (including Karl) who may be stupid enough to actually believe that the “Monarch Project” actually exists.

“Fritz Springmeier” and “Cathy O’Brien” are both — most likely – undiagnosed schizoprenics who have (somehow) managed to remain semi-“functional”, because their particular “subculture” is unusually compatible with their specific brand of delusional idiocy.

Karl (of course) is a die-hard believer in such things.


THIS is an impressive summation, in itself:

To state it plainly, indoctrination means to heavily influence someone into believing a particular set of ideas, whether they are political, cultural, or religious. Most often, this is done when the individual is particularly young, when he or she lack the ability to reasonably conclude whether or not a statement is true. Those who’ve experienced heavy indoctrination may be unaware of competing theories, alternate hypotheses, or even whether the ideas hold any merit at all; those ideas are simply believed and held dear for an unknown period of time.

I’d never advocate for one to indoctrinate their child with strong atheist ideas either; I think it’s very important that we teach children how to think, not what to think. I attended a religious institution as a young boy, around the age of 11 or 12. Up until that point, I will say, I wasn’t too concerned with religious beliefs. I rarely attended church services with my family, occasionally took part in religious traditions, and prayed now and then; I was far from a firm believer and I don’t think my parents ever were either. We were simply doing what everyone else was doing. That was, I think, the most important part of my experience as a child; I was never taught these things to be true by those whom I respected the most.

Since I was enrolled in this religious body, I do have firsthand knowledge regarding the practices of indoctrination. The pre-kindergarten class was heavily populated; the surrounding school district had a reputation of holding poor pre-kindergarten class, leaving this particular school the only option for many parents. We as older children often read them Bible stories, rehearsed prayers with them, taught them Christian hymns, and so on and so forth. What bothers me about it now was that I gladly took part in it. These poor children had no choice in the matter. They were being taught by their authorities that these particular sets of religious beliefs were true, without a chance of error.

And most of these children would stay in this particular school system, as most who had attended were my age. Almost all would tell you they knew God was real, Jesus walked on water, healed the sick, rose from the dead, was resurrected and ascended into heaven on the third day; to them, all of these things were as real as you or I. Never did they entertain the idea these things might not be true and neither were they influenced to challenge those beliefs. They weren’t taught about other faiths and why other individuals find those to be true. It was a terrible environment for a child to have been brought up in and I sincerely hope I am not the only one to have escaped from the information they forced on everyone. I even refrained from challenging out of fear I’d be mocked or punished; in a way, I indoctrinated myself into thinking religious beliefs were off the table to debate.

So what age are children most vulnerable to indoctrination? Children are typically open to believing almost anything told to them, without question. During early childhood, children are most receptive which is why education is most important during this period of time. Learning comes faster, the memory is crisp, and children are generally open and willing to accept new information without inhibition. The age of reason is typically considered to be around 6 or 7, when the child begins to have the capabilities to weigh options and reach conclusions. This is when we must be vigilant when trying to help them develop the how to think approach. The Socratic Method effectively helps the child develop the critical thinking skills needed to maintain a healthy thought process. This period of time hasn’t gone unnoticed by those who seek to mold the mind of the young for religious reasons.

Most Christian church organizations heavily involve children in many different events. Sunday school, summer Bible camps, wilderness retreats, catechism or confirmation, plays, and musical ceremonies top that particular list. These organizations are quite aware how impressionable children are and it appears as though they’re taking full advantage of that. Some evangelical Christian organizations fully and publicly acknowledge what they’re doing.

In Islam, indoctrination is taken a bit more seriously. From a very early age, Muslims are taught to memorize the Koran; sometimes, this often holds importance over studying other more earthly curriculums. This has two significant disadvantages. Firstly, this has a long lasting effect on the child’s cognitive development, as it’s primarily based on one particular source. Secondly, as a result of that, they will learn to reject other sources of knowledge simply because it deviates from what Islam teaches. This then, as I state previously, creates an “us” versus “them” frame of mind, completely carrying the Muslim believer further from enlightenment; never questioning and always accepting, brainwashing at its best. The very same can be said for most of the orthodox Jewish population. Anywhere religious instruction exists, expect indoctrination to take place.



The above is just about the best summation of the topic that I have encountered so far.

Why “geography of religion” matters:

One of the potential excuses which could be invoked to excuse the “geography of religion” thing is the observation that most people don’t actively ‘choose” which language(s) they’re subjected to first, either.


There’s a vast difference between the two issues, however:

Nobody claims that you’ll be sentenced to an eternity of “hellfire” for having been born into a Japanese-speaking population.

Oh, wait — some people are insane enough to battle over shit like that, too:

Time for an Ayn Rand quote:

A symptom of the tribal mentality’s self-arrested, perceptual level of development may be observed in the tribalists’ position on language.

Language is a conceptual tool—a code of visual-auditory symbols that denote concepts. To a person who understands the function of language, it makes no difference what sounds are chosen to name things, provided these sounds refer to clearly defined aspects of reality. But to a tribalist, language is a mystic heritage, a string of sounds handed down from his ancestors and memorized, not understood. To him, the importance lies in the perceptual concrete, the sound of a word, not its meaning. He would kill and die for the privilege of printing on every postage stamp the word “postage” for the English-speaking and the word “postes” for the French-speaking citizens of his bilingual Canada. Since most of the ethnic languages are not full languages, but merely dialects or local corruptions of a country’s language, the distinctions which the tribalists fight for are not even as big as that.

But, of course, it is not for their language that the tribalists are fighting: they are fighting to protect their level of awareness, their mental passivity, their obedience to the tribe, and their desire to ignore the existence of outsiders.


Probably the clearest examples of the utter correctness of Rand’s observation are the various “ethnoreligious” communities here in the U.S., and the history of the former Yugoslavia:

The only reason that  the pseudo-language of “Pennsylvania Dutch”  even exists at all, si because it is inextricably tied to several relatively-obscure religious sects (Amish/Mennonites/”Brethren”, etc.)






The “Hutterites” have their own absurd little “cult-speak”, as well:


The important thing to recognize about such “languages” is that they exist to prevent communication with “outsiders” – to insulate those with the bad luck to have been “born into” such communities, and prevent them from ever escaping.

Of course, the same thing can be said for Yiddish — especially among the Hasidim:


I’ve come to the conclusion that approximately 99% of humanity “learn” their religious beliefts/practices the same way they “learn” the sexism, racism, etc. which so often go right along with those “beliefs” and “practices”.








99% of humanity don’t actually ‘believe” the religion perpetrated on them by their “community”


This is true even among purportedly “universalizing” religions like Christianity.

Barring some sort of very extraordinary and unusual disruption, you are overwhelmingly likely to simply ape/parrot your “tribe” — and profess “belief” in whatever the local hobgoblins happen to be called.

That’s why I can’t take 99% of such antics seriously.