I’ll repeat it again: there is a basic distinction between genuine beliefs/opinions, and mere aping/parroting:

The above is one reason why I have zero respect — or even interest — in the religious “beliefs” of approximately 99% of humanity.

In an early post, I highlighted a statistic which should terrify anyone proclaiming a religious ‘belief” of any kind: The vast majority of those who bother to be actively involved with religion MERELY end up aping/parroting whatever their PARENTS (or some equivalent) claimed to “believe”.

Only about 1% actively choose their religious “beliefs”.  It is a safe bet that those who convert from whatever religion was perpetrated on them (if any) during childhood have actually expended some fairly serious thought about what they actually ‘believe’, and the “practices’ to which those beliefs “should” lead.

I’m willing to entertain the theoretical possibility that some specific subset of those who merely end up “embracing” the “faith tradition” perpetrated on them during childhood/endemic to their specific demographic ‘community” have also done so after investing serious effort into examining the merits of such ‘beliefs” and “practices” — but realistically, there is no way, whatsoever to even begin to distinguish those folks from those who merely ape/parrot for more distinctly ‘social” reasons, such as:

  1. Nostalgia
  2. “social” pressure (IE: emotional blackmail)
  3. simple passivity/anti-effort
  4. Too thoughtless to have ever even thought such questions

That is why, in the vast majority of cases, I simply cannot bring myself to have any “respect” for the professed religious “beliefs” of others:  aping/parroting/having succumbed to “emotional  blackmail” do not strike me as as worthy of “respect”

That’s the bottom line: one of the reasons that religion tends to be such a “sensitive” issue for many (most?) is: since they are MERELY aping/parroting — as opposed to even ATTEMPTING to understand — that which they claim to ‘believe’, it follows that they are INCAPABLE of  rationally defending — or in most cases, even explaining — those ‘beliefs”.

That’s where shit like “To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible.” comes in:

It allows them to “frame” their INABILITY to explain/defend the various claims made by their “faith”, as A MARK OF VIRTUE.

Now don’t get me wrong: the fact that I have no respect whatsoever either for what you claim to ‘believe”, or for your motives for such pretense does not mean that I will (necessarily) go out of my way to make fun of you/your beliefs — to your face.

Then again, I wouldn’t go out of my way to imitate/make fun of someone suffering from Tourette Syndrome, either.

In both cases, the afflicted individual CANNOT HELP IT.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s